Technological Revolutions and Techno-Economic Paradigms

By C. Pérez. 2010

921 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/379512982cd5ed77893b9c8327a22d973bd726b4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Management Science and Operations Research

Citations in the corpus

The renewable energies technology surge: A new techno-economic paradigm in the making? (2012, background): “Perez (2004; 2009; 2010; 2011; 2012) provides further elaboration.”
Introduction to special issue: stranded assets and the environment (2017, background): “Schumpeter built on the work of Kondratiev (1926) and the idea of ‘long waves’ in the economic cycle (Perez 2010).”
Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of innovation systems research: a bibliometric analysis (2015, background): “For example, many works in the knowledge domain under study have drawn inspiration from evolutionary economics (Metcalfe 1995; Perez 2010).”
Economics of Blockchain (2016, positive): “This is a model of an evolutionary process of market and industrial dynamics (Dopfer and Potts 2008)— in which blockchains are a new species in the ‘technium’ (Arthur 2009)—eventually forming a new techno-economic paradigm (Perez 2009).”
The Evolution of Management Models: A Neo-Schumpeterian Theory (2018, methodology): “Various actors address these reverse salients through experimentation (Abernathy and Utterback, 1978; Perez, 2010), and as they are overcome, there emerges a ‘‘dominant design’’ (Utterback and Abernathy, 1975; Utterback and Súarez, 1993), ‘‘technological paradigm’’ (Dosi, 1982), or ‘‘technological…”
Blockchains and the economic institutions of capitalism (2018, positive): “It is said that blockchains are a new general purpose technology (Pilkington 2016), of the same class of technological trajectories as, for instance, electricity, transistors, computers, the internet, mobile phones and so on (Perez 2009).”
Path Dependence and New Technological Path Creation in the Danish Wind Power Industry (2012, background): “Perez (2010) also argues that “Studies of innovation (the emergence of novelty) have shown that the introduction of technical change is not random but (itself) path dependent and interdependent with other innovations clustered in systems . . .” (p. 199).”
Climate Change, Financial Stability and Monetary Policy (2018, positive): “As has been emphasised in the neo-Schumpeterian/evolutionary literature (see e.g. Perez, 2009, 2010), a shift to a new techno-economic paradigm might entail transition risks, can cause ﬁ nancial booms and busts and can lead to fundamental socio-economic changes.”
Greening of the financial system and fuelling a sustainability transition (2018, methodology): “In the wake of neo-Schumpeterian theory, we shall consider the emergence of a new environmentally sustainable trajectory of development as the outcome of the joint evolution of two interrelated subsystems: the techno-economic and the socio-institutional (Perez, 2010).”
Deep transitions: Emergence, acceleration, stabilization and directionality (2018, positive): “plastics), new technologies, products and processes, and new or fundamentally redefined infrastructures (Perez, 2010).”