The rocking spectrum and the limitations of practical design methodologies

By N. Makris, Dimitrios Konstantinidis. 2003

314 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/37941b2943c78ab8b46b7b95c8f64078fdcbbfc8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Civil and Structural Engineering

1. T. Paraskeva
2. José C. Matos
3. Ioannis Stefanou
4. E. Dimitrakopoulos
5. Mauro Sassu
6. L. Giresini
7. Roman Denysiuk
8. Claudia Casapulla

In Control and Systems Engineering

1. T. Paraskeva
2. José C. Matos
3. E. Dimitrakopoulos
4. Mauro Sassu
5. L. Giresini
6. Roman Denysiuk
7. Claudia Casapulla

Citations in the corpus

• Fragility curves for free and restrained rocking masonry façades in one-sided motion (2018, methodology): “[14] N. Makris and D. Konstantinidis, “The rocking spectrum and the limitations of practical design methodologies,” Earthq.”
• Dynamic motion of a conical frustum over a rough horizontal plane (2011, background): “The stability and resistance of modern columns to axial and lateral loads and moments is owed to the development of internal tensile forces, while the stability and resistance of classical columns is owed only to their self-weight [23] and geometric characteristics.”
• Dimensionless fragility curves for rocking response to near‐fault excitations (2015, background): “The comparison of the two archetypal systems is as follows: the rocking block and the elastic oscillator [9, 10] encapsulate many of the distinct”