The dark side of the sharing economy … and how to lighten it

393 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Can You Gig It? An Empirical Examination of the Gig Economy and Entrepreneurial Activity (2018, neutral): “Indeed, these platforms are already estimated to comprise a roughly $26 billion market (Malhotra and Van Alstyne 2014) and numerous studies have explored patterns of demand for services provided by gig-economy platforms (Edelman and Luca 2014, Greenwood and Wattal 2015, Zervas et al. 2015).”
Effect of sharing economy on tourism industry employment. (2016, result): “By contrast, previous studies have focused only on either the positive (Cervero, Golub, & Nee, 2007; Martin, Shaheen, & Lidicker, 2010) or negative (Malhotra et al., 2014; Zervas et al., 2014) side.”
Peer-to-Peer Product Sharing: Implications for Ownership, Usage, and Social Welfare in the Sharing Economy (2019, methodology): “For further discussion and additional examples, see Botsman and Rogers [2010], Malhotra and Alstyne [2014], Cusumano [2014], and Chase [2015].”
It's Time to Do Something: Mitigating the Negative Impacts of Computing Through a Change to the Peer Review Process (2021, background): “Gig economy platforms have undermined local governments and use technology for “regulatory arbitrage” [10,20].”