The AME2016 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references

By M. Wang 王, G. 乔. Audi 欧, F. Kondev, W. Huang 黄, S. Naimi, X. Xu 徐. 2012

2,341 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/377da95fff7b4303e07c67f7f1907574f023a91d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

1. K. Langanke
2. G. Mart'inez-Pinedo
3. A. Aprahamian
4. J. Cowan
5. C. Sneden
6. S. Goriely
7. Witold Nazarewicz
8. Paul-Gerhard Reinhard

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

1. G. Mart'inez-Pinedo
2. K. Langanke
3. S. Goriely
4. Friedrich-Karl Thielemann
5. J. Cowan
6. C. Sneden
7. A. Aprahamian
8. A. Potekhin

Citations in the corpus

• Unified equations of state for cold non-accreting neutron stars with Brussels-Montreal functionals. I. Role of symmetry energy (2018, methodology): “The parameters of these functionals were determined primarily by fitting to essentially all the data of the 2003 Atomic Mass Evaluation, AME 2003 (Audi, Wapstra & Thibault 2003), with the nuclear masses being calculated using the Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov (HFB) method.”
• Charge radii of exotic potassium isotopes challenge nuclear theory and the magic character of N = 32 (2020, neutral): “[33] Wang, M.”