Some varieties of robustness
By Jim Woodward. 2006
198 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, History and Philosophy of Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/377b5895b8db92f118a13df6f1bcf61bd4731e6a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
In History and Philosophy of Science
Citations in the corpus
- Incredible Worlds, Credible Results (2009, background): “When our confidence about our inferences 5 See Woodward (2006) for an account of different types of robustness, and Wimsatt (1981) or Weisberg (2006) for an account of its epistemic importance.”
- Buyer beware: robustness analyses in economics and biology (2011, background): “Robustness is here understood as ‘‘derivational robustness’’, to use James Woodward’s term, i.e., the independence of the consequences of a model from particular assumptions used to derive these consequences (Woodward 2006).”
- Evidential Diversity and the Triangulation of Phenomena (2016, background): “…has recently been the focus of sustained philosophical attention, but different bodies of literature refer to rather different practices under the general category of robustness analysis ðe.g., Wimsatt 1981; Weisberg 2006; Woodward 2006; Stegenga 2009; Soler et al. 2012; Hey 2015Þ.1 According 1.”
- How Accurate Is the Standard Second? (2011, background): “These two conditions loosely correspond to what Woodward (2006) calls “measurement robustness” and “derivational robustness.””