Dependence of single-molecule junction conductance on molecular conformation

By L. Venkataraman, Jennifer E. Klare, C. Nuckolls, M. Hybertsen, M. Steigerwald. Nature, 2006

1,268 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Since it was first suggested that a single molecule might function as an active electronic component, a number of techniques have been developed to measure the charge transport properties of single molecules. Although scanning tunnelling microscopy observations under high vacuum conditions can allow stable measurements of electron transport, most measurements of a single molecule bonded in a metal–molecule–metal junction exhibit relatively large variations in conductance. As a result, even simple predictions about how molecules behave in such junctions have still not been rigorously tested. For instance, it is well known that the tunnelling current passing through a molecule depends on its conformation; but although some experiments have verified this effect, a comprehensive mapping of how junction conductance changes with molecular conformation is not yet available. In the simple case of a biphenyl—a molecule with two phenyl rings linked by a single C–C bond—conductance is expected to change with the relative twist angle between the two rings, with the planar conformation having the highest conductance. Here we use amine link groups to form single-molecule junctions with more reproducible current–voltage characteristics. This allows us to extract average conductance values from thousands of individual measurements on a series of seven biphenyl molecules with different ring substitutions that alter the twist angle of the molecules. We find that the conductance for the series decreases with increasing twist angle, consistent with a cosine-squared relation predicted for transport through π-conjugated biphenyl systems.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/376bbb0344d1b7130d6071e6cdf7c8c3bde01694

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. Richard Koryt'ar
  2. S. Tewari
  3. F. Evers
  4. J. V. van Ruitenbeek
  5. L. Venkataraman
  6. Michael Galperin
  7. Mark A. Ratner
  8. Jeffrey B. Neaton

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  1. Richard Koryt'ar
  2. S. Tewari
  3. F. Evers
  4. J. V. van Ruitenbeek
  5. T. O. S. University
  6. Israel
  7. Northwestern University School of Chemistry
  8. L. Venkataraman

Citations in the corpus