Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting

By K. Poole. 2005

389 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Fightin' Words: Lexical Feature Selection and Evaluation for Identifying the Content of Political Conflict (2008, background): “Rollcall-based work suggests that a single ideological dimension accounts for virtually all Congressional divisions (Poole 2005).”
Using Bayesian Aldrich-McKelvey Scaling to Study Citizens' Ideological Preferences and Perceptions (2015, background): “Theoretically, the common stimuli can be used to bridge across regions or time to place all of the stimuli on a common scale, and this has been implemented in other applications (Poole, 2005; Shor and McCarty, 2011; Bakker, Jolly, Polk and Poole, 2014).”
Government-Opposition or Left-Right? The Institutional Determinants of Voting in Legislatures* (2015, methodology): “The impetus came from new scaling methods (for example, Poole and Rosenthal 1997; Poole 2005).”
Estimating Dynamic State Preferences from United Nations Voting Data (2017, methodology): “The S score approach differs sharply from contemporary measurement models used for other voting bodies, where scholars invariably use spatial models and item response theory (IRT) empirical methods (e.g., Poole 2005).”