The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public – A systematic review and meta-analysis
By M. Luo, Lixia Guo, Mingzhou Yu, Wenying Jiang, Haiyan Wang. Psychiatry Research, 2020
1,457 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Highlights • We included 62 studies from 17 countries assessing psychological distress of COVID-19.• We found a high psychological burden among medical staff and the general public.• However, the psychological distress was significantly higher among patients.• We identified risk factors of psychological burdens to identify high-risk people.• Professional medical services should be allocated to high-risk population.• More self-help materials should be made available for people with milder impact.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Oncology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3761d5faa655164828b3db2dad154e7e23319f34
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In General Health Professions
Citations in the corpus
- COVID‐19 anxiety among front‐line nurses: Predictive role of organisational support, personal resilience and social support (2020, background): “Among HCWs, nurses were reported to experience the highest anxiety levels and the highest prevalence of anxiety, ranging from 15% to 92% (Alwani et al., 2020; Luo et al., 2020).”