Hydrological droughts in the 21st century, hotspots and uncertainties from a global multimodel ensemble experiment

By Christel Prudhomme, I. Giuntoli, E. Robinson, D. Clark, N. Arnell, R. Dankers, Balazs M. Fekete, W. Franssen, Dieter Gerten, Simon N. Gosling and 8 more. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013

728 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Significance Increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere are widely expected to influence global climate over the coming century. The impact on drought is uncertain because of the complexity of the processes but can be estimated using outputs from an ensemble of global models (hydrological and climate models). Using an ensemble of 35 simulations, we show a likely increase in the global severity of drought by the end of 21st century, with regional hotspots including South America and Central and Western Europe in which the frequency of drought increases by more than 20%. The main source of uncertainty in the results comes from the hydrological models, with climate models contributing to a substantial but smaller amount of uncertainty. Increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere are expected to modify the global water cycle with significant consequences for terrestrial hydrology. We assess the impact of climate change on hydrological droughts in a multimodel experiment including seven global impact models (GIMs) driven by bias-corrected climate from five global climate models under four representative concentration pathways (RCPs). Drought severity is defined as the fraction of land under drought conditions. Results show a likely increase in the global severity of hydrological drought at the end of the 21st century, with systematically greater increases for RCPs describing stronger radiative forcings. Under RCP8.5, droughts exceeding 40% of analyzed land area are projected by nearly half of the simulations. This increase in drought severity has a strong signal-to-noise ratio at the global scale, and Southern Europe, the Middle East, the Southeast United States, Chile, and South West Australia are identified as possible hotspots for future water security issues. The uncertainty due to GIMs is greater than that from global climate models, particularly if including a GIM that accounts for the dynamic response of plants to CO2 and climate, as this model simulates little or no increase in drought frequency. Our study demonstrates that different representations of terrestrial water-cycle processes in GIMs are responsible for a much larger uncertainty in the response of hydrological drought to climate change than previously thought. When assessing the impact of climate change on hydrology, it is therefore critical to consider a diverse range of GIMs to better capture the uncertainty.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Water Science and Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/37604a35b4396af5f216ee7e6a1bb8c2cf17db58

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. Yoshihide Wada
  2. Philip J. Ward
  3. Inge E. M. de Graaf
  4. L. V. van Beek
  5. Justin Sheffield
  6. Eric F. Wood
  7. Philippe Ciais
  8. Stéphane Hallegatte

In Water Science and Technology

  1. Yoshihide Wada
  2. Philip J. Ward
  3. Inge E. M. de Graaf
  4. L. V. van Beek
  5. Junguo Liu
  6. Stéphane Hallegatte
  7. M. V. van Vliet
  8. Hannes Müller Schmied

Citations in the corpus