The Family Adoption Communication (FAC) Model

By G. M. Wrobel, Julie K. Kohler, H. Grotevant, R. McRoy. 2003

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Safety Research, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3759d771ea474f279a3fb220acc8c57df959bb3d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. D. Brodzinsky

In Safety Research

1. E. Neil
2. D. Brodzinsky
3. M. Lamb

In Social Psychology

1. D. Brodzinsky

Citations in the corpus

• Post-Adoption Contact and Openness in Adoptive Parents’ Minds: Consequences for Children’s Development (2009, background): “about adoption, beginning with the seminal work of Kirk (e.g. Kirk, 1964; McWhinnie, 1967; Jaffee and Fanshel, 1970; Triseliotis, 1973; Raynor, 1980; Stein and Hoopes, 1985; Kaye, 1990; Wrobel et al., 2003).”
• Family Structural Openness and Communication Openness as Predictors in the Adjustmentof Adopted Children (2006, background): “For a more in-depth analysis of adoption communication theory, the reader should consult Brodzinsky (2005) and Wrobel et al. (2003).”