Design and implementation of CUSUM exceedance control charts for unknown location
By Marien Alet Graham, Subhabrata Chakraborti, Amitava Mukherjee. 2014
64 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3726e99275a5e68ac4bc5b5beb562a19d97904f6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Nonparametric Phase-II control charts for monitoring high-dimensional processes with unknown parameters (2020, background): “We set m ¼ 100, 300; n ¼ 5, 10; p ¼ 3, 10, 100 and MRL0 ¼ 250: Interested readers may see, for example Graham, Chakraborti, and Mukherjee (2014), for various advantage of implementing the SPM schemes with a pre-fixed MRL0 and for the motivation of choosing MRL0 ¼ 250: The entire set of positive…”
- Monitoring the ratio of population means of a bivariate normal distribution using CUSUM type control charts (2016, methodology): “In practice, Hawkins and Wu (2014) concluded that the CUSUM chart generally outperforms the EWMAchart if the actual shift is close to what was expected but the EWMAchart may respond faster if the actual shift is smaller than the one used in the design.”