The subspecies concept in butterflies: has its application in taxonomy and conservation biology outlived its usefulness?

By M. Braby, R. Eastwood, N. Murray. 2012

183 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/371dcff561a164d5a8abd9390a79b126ea890a77

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. R. Frankham
2. C. Fenster
3. J. Fuerst
4. R. Lacy
5. S. Martén-Rodríguez
6. M. Rosenberg

In Genetics

1. R. Frankham
2. R. Lacy
3. J. Ballou
4. C. Fenster
5. K. Ralls
6. P. Sunnucks
7. Mark Eldridge
8. Michele R. Dudash

Citations in the corpus

• Call for a Paradigm Shift in the Genetic Management of Fragmented Populations (2018, background): “As problems with the delineations of species, subspecies, and ESUs are common, managers and their advisors should review the adequacy of existing taxonomy before planning genetic rescue (Braby et al. 2012; Garnett & Christidis 2017).”
• The Nature of Race (2015, background): “For a rather different and in our opinion erroneous reading of the concept see Braby et al. (2012). Compare their Figure 2 to de Queiroz's (2007) Figure 1 and discussion.”