Theorizing identity in transnational and diaspora cultures: A critical approach to acculturation

301 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Travels in hyper-diversity: Multiculturalism and the contextual assessment of acculturation (2013, background): “Several scholars have underscored the important role that contextual factors such as the socio-political orientation of the mainstream (‘host’) community (Bourhis et al., 1997), or colonial histories and diasporic communities (Bhatia & Ram, 2009), play in shaping the multicultural mind.”
Refugees, Acculturation Strategies, Stress and Integration (2010, background): “Others have criticised this approach as ‘fixed, invariant, and apolitical’ (Bhatia and Ram, 2009: 140) and proposed that acculturation be understood instead as an ongoing negotiation between past and present, and country of origin and country of refuge, wherein identity is contested and constantly…”
Transnational Families and Social Technologies: Reassessing Immigration Psychology (2012, unknown): “Still others may reject both sets of cultural values and/or present various forms of enculturation, not acculturation, with individuals composing their identities with pieces from various cultures and the meaning assigned to them (Bhatia and Ram 2009).”