Reinforcement Learning from Automatic Feedback for High-Quality Unit Test Generation

By Benjamin Steenhoek, Michele Tufano, Neel Sundaresan, Alexey Svyatkovskiy. 2023

51 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Software testing is a crucial but time-consuming aspect of software development, and recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained popularity for automated test case generation. However, because LLMs are trained on vast amounts of open-source code, they often generate test cases that do not adhere to best practices and may even contain test smells (anti-patterns). To address this issue, we propose Reinforcement Learning from Static Quality Metrics (RLSQM), wherein we utilize Reinforcement Learning to generate high-quality unit tests based on static analysis-based quality metrics. First, we analyzed LLM-generated tests and show that LLMs frequently do generate undesirable test smells — up to 37% of the time. Then, we implemented lightweight static analysis-based reward model and trained LLMs using this reward model to optimize for five code quality metrics. Our experimental results demonstrate that the RL-optimized Codex model consistently generated higher-quality test cases than the base LLM, improving quality metrics by up to 23%, and generated nearly 100% syntactically-correct code. RLSQM also outperformed GPT-4 on all code quality metrics, in spite of training a substantially cheaper Codex model. We provide insights into how reliably utilize RL to improve test generation quality and show that RLSQM is a significant step towards enhancing the overall efficiency and reliability of automated software testing. Our data are available at this link: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25983166.

Subfields: Information Systems, Software, Reinforcement Learning, Code Generation & Program Synthesis

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems

  1. Armando Solar-Lezama
  2. Koushik Sen
  3. Naman Jain
  4. Tianjun Zhang
  5. Ion Stoica
  6. Rishabh Singh
  7. Mosharaf Chowdhury
  8. Charles Sutton

In Software

  1. Armando Solar-Lezama
  2. Koushik Sen
  3. Naman Jain
  4. Tianjun Zhang
  5. Ion Stoica
  6. Patrice Godefroid
  7. Rishabh Singh
  8. Gordon Fraser

In Reinforcement Learning

  1. Armando Solar-Lezama
  2. Tianjun Zhang
  3. Ion Stoica

In Code Generation & Program Synthesis

  1. Armando Solar-Lezama
  2. Koushik Sen
  3. Rishabh Singh

Citations in the corpus