Evaluation of inter-simple sequence repeat analysis for mapping in Citrus and extension of the genetic linkage map

By A. Sankar, Gloria A. Moore. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2001

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cell Biology, Horticulture, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/371093e9a1ab84b14f5f645e77f0bd3a70433a98

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cell Biology

1. Å. Bjornstad
2. M. Ndjiondjop
3. K. Semagn

In Plant Science

1. K. Semagn
2. Å. Bjornstad
3. Xianlong Zhang
4. O. Gulsen
5. M. Ndjiondjop
6. A. Uzun
7. G. Jiang
8. Yunbi Xu

Citations in the corpus

• EST-SSR genetic maps for Citrus sinensis and Poncirus trifoliata (2007, unknown): “Roose et al. 2000 RAPD, RFLP, ISSR 156 16 701 4 Sankar and Moore 2001 ISSR, RAPD, RFLP, isozymes 310 9 874 3 Ruiz and Asins 2003 RAPD, SSR, IRAP 48 for Poncirus 10 7a, 7b, 7c 120 for C. aurantium 17”
• QTL mapping for economic traits based on a dense genetic map of cotton with PCR-based markers using the interspecific cross of Gossypium hirsutum × Gossypium barbadense (2006, methodology): “Sankar and Moore (2001) reported that the conservation of marker order may be a function of the number of markers in the LGs. Measurements of QTL traits and phenotypic variation Measurements of each trait from both mapping parents and F2:3 families were averaged over two replicates consisting of ten”
• A new citrus linkage map based on SRAP, SSR, ISSR, POGP, RGA and RAPD markers (2010, background): “1, 2). This type of clustering is common (Tanksley et al. 1992; Sankar and Moore 2001; Oliveira et al. 2005; Oliveira et al. 2007), except for, although not exclusively, centromeric regions, where reduced recombination usually applies (Tanksley et al. 1992).”
• An overview of molecular marker methods for plants (2006, background): “ISSRs segregate mostly as dominant markers (Gupta et al., 1994; Tsumura et al., 1996; Ratnaparkhe et al., 1998; Wang et al., 1998), although co-dominant segregation has been reported in some cases (Wu et al., 1994; Akagi et al., 1996; Wang et al., 1998; Sankar and Moore, 2001).”