A theoretical basis for measures of kin selection in subdivided populations: finite populations and localized dispersal

By Rousset, Billiard. 2000

223 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Social semantics: how useful has group selection been? (2008, background): “…demographies such as fluctuations in group size, finite population sizes, inbreeding depression and clarifying the links with graph theory (Rousset & Billiard, 2000; Roze & Rousset, 2003, 2004; Rousset, 2004; Rousset & Ronce, 2004; Taylor et al., 2007a; Grafen, in press; Lehmann et al.,…”
The evolution of cooperation and altruism – a general framework and a classification of models (2006, methodology): “The model is framed within the direct fitness approach (Taylor & Frank, 1996; Frank, 1998; Rousset & Billiard, 2000; Rousset, 2004).”
Evolution of the distribution of dispersal distance under distance‐dependent cost of dispersal (2002, methodology): “0 SDðzaÞ 1 Q0 ð2Þ where SDðzaÞ X i ðQ0i 1Þ@zi wðz ; z;DÞ ð3Þ (Rousset & Billiard, 2000).”
THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY (2010, methodology): “" The fact that inclusive fitness calculations are more complicated than direct fitness calculations has been accepted by theoreticians such as Rousset and Billiard (2000) and Taylor et al (2006).”
A new route to the evolution of cooperation (2006, background): “In what concerns kin-selection, for instance, local dispersal and population structure play a sizeable role (Rousset & Billiard, 2000).”
Games on graphs (2014, methodology): “Identity-by-descent methods have been applied to a variety of problems in evolution [91], [83], [110], [6], [116].”