Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning at local and regional spatial scales
By Emily M. Bond, Jonathan M. Chase. 2002
143 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/36f7d8575b5c108385f05720bdfd61fed989cc02
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- T. Tscharntke
- J. van Ruijven
- T. O. Crist
- N. Mouquet
- J. Tylianakis
- F. Berendse
- M. Vellend
- David Mouillot
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- T. Tscharntke
- J. Tylianakis
- J. van Ruijven
- D. Kleijn
- F. Berendse
- R. Bommarco
- N. Mouquet
- Michel Loreau
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- T. Tscharntke
- J. Tylianakis
- J. van Ruijven
- F. Berendse
- N. Mouquet
- D. Kleijn
- T. O. Crist
- Melinda D. Smith
Citations in the corpus
- Biodiversity-Ecosystem Function Research: Is It Relevant to Conservation? (2005, background): “…an increased probability of including functionally important species (sampling effect: Table 1); however, there may also be a negative effect when additional species reduce, through interspecific competition, the abundance of functionally important species (Bond & Chase 2002, Loreau et al. 2003).”
- Scale dependence in the species-richness-productivity relationship: The role of species turnover (2004, background): “…between species richness and net primary productivity, key measures of biodiversity and ecosystem function, has been particularly controversial, with disagreement over whether productivity controls or is controlled by species richness (Waide et al. 1999, Loreau et al. 2001, Bond and Chase 2002).”
- Crenic habitats, hotspots for freshwater biodiversity conservation: toward an understanding of their ecology (2012, background): “Bond and Chase (2002) showed that species diversity becomes increasingly important to ecosystem functioning at higher (regional) spatial scales.”
- Community Patterns in Source‐Sink Metacommunities (2003, background): “Using a verbal model, Bond and Chase (2002) argued on the basis of Mouquet and Loreau (2002) that in the context of a metacommunity a regional complementarity among species could lead to a positive relationship between productivity and regional species richness, whereas a hump-shaped relationship…”
- Conservation biological control and enemy diversity on a landscape scale (2007, background): “Betweenpatch species turnover may both promote regional diversity that enhances ecosystem functioning (Srivastava and Vellend, 2005) and provide a variety of different functions at the regional scale (Bond and Chase, 2002).”
- Challenges in linking trait patterns to niche differentiation (2016, background): “…assembly patterns and ecosystem processes (Weiher and Keddy 1999), with focus on scale-dependence of species diversity, composition and spatial distribution (Cody 1999), phylogenetic relatedness (Cavender-Bares et al. 2006, Swenson et al. 2007), and ecosystem function (Bond and Chase 2002).”
- Rainfall Shocks, Resilience, and the Effects of Crop Biodiversity on Agroecosystem Productivity (2008, unknown): “4 In essence, this is ‘‘niche partitioning at regional scale’’ (Bond and Chase 2002).”
- Functional groups of lagoon fish species in Languedoc Roussillon, southern France (2004, background): “It is important to study the impact of these activities on the different biotic components of the lagoon ecosystem and on the different ecosystem processes, i.e. productivity, stability and resilience (Chapin et al., 1997; Tilman et al., 1997; Loreau, 2000; Loreau et al., 2001; Bond & Chase, 2002).”
- Positive effects of plant species diversity on productivity in the absence of legumes (2003, background): “…effect indicates that species-rich communities are able to exploit the available resources more completely (Naeem et al. 1994; Tilman et al. 1996; Hooper & Vitousek 1997; Tilman et al. 1997b; Loreau 1998; Bond & Chase 2002), but the mechanisms by which this is achieved remain unclear.”
- Above-ground standing biomass and tree species diversity in natural stands of Central Europe (2007, background): “…in a given stand is a result of two opposing forces; competition among tree species can lead to the local decrease in species number (Hubbell et al. 2001; Lambers et al. 2002), and migration from the regional species pool contributes to maintaining higher species diversity (Bond & Chase 2002).”