The Genetic Architecture of Maize Flowering Time
By S. E. Bassett, G. Milne, J. Mitrovica, P. Clark, J. Briner, G. Miller, P. Davis, R. Finkel. 2009
542 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/36f31eede4232e955b1948c17f8f319ecfec9fd2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Evolution of plant materials for ecological restoration: insights from the applied and basic literature (2017, background): “Variation in flowering time may be a good proxy for genetic variation in the offspring population because this trait is generally controlled by multiple loci distributed over entire genomes (Buckler et al. 2009; Salom e et al. 2011; Huang et al. 2012; Charmantier, Garant & Kruuk 2014).”
- SNP Discovery through Next-Generation Sequencing and Its Applications (2012, background): “The identification of candidate genes for flowering time in Brassica [127] and maize [128] are practical examples of gene discovery through SNP-based genetic maps.”
- Natural variations and genome-wide association studies in crop plants. (2014, methodology): “In maize, the genetic architectures of flowering time, leaf angle, leaf size, and disease resistance traits were dissected by conducting linkage mapping and GWAS jointly in the NAM panel, and multiple related candidate genes were identified (12, 58, 86, 109).”
- Prediction of Genetic Values of Quantitative Traits in Plant Breeding Using Pedigree and Molecular Markers (2010, background): “In this respect, our results are different from those of Buckler et al. (2009), who reported low levels of genotype 3 environment interaction for the same traits.”
- Molecular mechanisms of polyploidy and hybrid vigor (2010, background): “In outcrossing maize, the flowering time is mediated by additive effects of numerous (two-dozen or more) quantitative loci (QTLs), each with only a small effect on the trait [59].”
- Seasonal and developmental timing of flowering. (2010, background): “This developmental criterion is not always applied in flowering studies in other species, particularly in crop species in which days to flower is often the only measure of flowering differences among genotypes (e.g. Buckler et al., 2009).”
- Association Mapping for Enhancing Maize (Zea mays L.) Genetic Improvement (2011, background): “…between two diverse lines every 44 bp throughout the maize genomic sequence (Gore et al., 2009) and that the divergence between two maize inbred lines is even greater than between human and chimpanzees, which diverged as independent species 3.5 million years ago (Buckler and Stevens, 2005).”
- Marker-Assisted Plant Breeding: Principles and Practices (2015, background): “For example, extensive association studies for flowering time in maize have revealed that many variants clustered in a few common loci affect this trait (Buckler et al. 2009).”
- Potential for evolutionary responses to climate change – evidence from tree populations (2013, result): “These findings are consistent with the small effect sizes of flowering time and leaf trait variation loci in maize (Buckler et al., 2009; Tian et al., 2011), and human height (Hill et al.”
- Genomic selection in plant breeding: from theory to practice. (2010, background): “Recent extensive mapping efforts for flowering time in maize [61] provide support for the common gene hypothesis that the many variants that affect maize flowering time are clustered in a few common loci.”