The temperature‐size rule emerges from ontogenetic differences between growth and development rates

By J. Forster, A. Hirst. 2012

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/36befe139fe3bc4947bc30c46b6b8b0378a65a83

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. R. Thompson
2. M. Meerhoff
3. M. Trimmer
4. M. Ledger
5. Erik Jeppesen
6. G. Woodward
7. Christian Mulder
8. J. Belmaker

In Global and Planetary Change

1. G. Woodward
2. C. T. Marshall
3. R. Kordas
4. Jonathan B. Shurin
5. J. Morrongiello
6. M. Trimmer

Citations in the corpus

• Mesocosm Experiments as a Tool for Ecological Climate-Change Research (2013, background): “It has been observed in almost all ectotherms that have been investigated (Daufresne et al., 2009; Walters and Hassall, 2006; but see, O’Gorman et al., 2012; Gardner et al., 2011), yet a precise mechanism remains elusive (Forster and Hirst, 2012, Forster et al., 2011).”
• Is oxygen limitation in warming waters a valid mechanism to explain decreased body sizes in aquatic ectotherms? (2018, background): “temperature dependence in developmental rates (cell division or increase in life stage per time) 456 versus growth rates (cell growth or increase in weight per time) (van der Have & de Jong 1996; 457 Zuo et al. 2012; Forster and Hirst 2012).”