Humans and Automation: System Design and Research Issues
By Thomas B. Sheridan. 2002
327 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/36bd540a5b5469b1dbb0ad9da8f3835704e8f982
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- C. Wickens
- Raja Parasuraman
- Dietrich Manzey
- Linda Onnasch
- Mica R. Endsley
- John D. Lee
- David B. Kaber
- Linda Ng Boyle
Citations in the corpus
- Human factors of transitions in automated driving: A general framework and literature survey (2016, background): “One type of such human-machine interaction is shared control (Abbink, Mulder, & Boer, 2012; De Winter & Dodou, 2011; Johns et al., 2016; see also Sheridan, 2002; Sheridan & Verplank, 1978), a concept which has been extended towards a framework of ‘cooperative control’ (Flemisch, Bengler, Bubb,…”
- Complacency and Bias in Human Use of Automation: An Attentional Integration (2010, background): “…models posited by Moray (2003; Moray & Inagaki, 2000) and Senders (1964) do not consider the potential cost of sampling (e.g., extensive eye or head movements or search time) or the value provided by sampled information, which can pose severe limits on the rate of sampling (Sheridan, 1970, 2002).”
- Drivers' attitudes toward imperfect distraction mitigation strategies (2006, background): “Based on recent definitions of automation levels (Parasuraman, Sheridan, & Wickens, 2000; Sheridan, 2002), high (e.g., automation takes control and ignores human), moderate (e.g., automation executes action only if human approves) and low (e.g., automation provides information only) levels of…”
- Natural human role in supervising complex control systems (2009, background): “Agents are treated as subordinates even when their actions are automated (Sheridan 2002).”
- Human Performance Consequences of Stages and Levels of Automation (2014, background): “It has been long known that automation can both hurt and benefit human performance (e.g., Bainbridge, 1983; Ephrath & Young, 1981; Kessel & Wickens, 1982; Rasmussen & Rouse, 1981; Sheridan, 2002; Wickens & Kes-sel, 1979, 1981; Wickens, Mavor, Parasuraman, & McGee, 1998; Wiener & Curry, 1980).”
- Situation awareness and workload in driving while using adaptive cruise control and a cell phone (2005, background): “This is because automation can change the nature of demands and responsibilities on the operator, often in ways that were unintended or unanticipated by designers (Sheridan, 2002).”