Urban Driving with Multi-Objective Deep Reinforcement Learning
By Krzysztof Czarnecki. 2018
86 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Autonomous driving is a challenging domain that entails multiple aspects: a vehicle should be able to drive to its destination as fast as possible while avoiding collision, obeying traffic rules and ensuring the comfort of passengers. In this paper, we present a deep learning variant of thresholded lexicographic Q-learning for the task of urban driving. Our multi-objective DQN agent learns to drive on multi-lane roads and intersections, yielding and changing lanes according to traffic rules. We also propose an extension for factored Markov Decision Processes to the DQN architecture that provides auxiliary features for the Q function. This is shown to significantly improve data efficiency. \footnoteData efficiency as measured by the number of training steps required to achieve similar performance. We then show that the learned policy is able to zero-shot transfer to a ring road without sacrificing performance.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Automotive Engineering
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- W. B. Knox
- Peter Stone
- Senthil Kumar Yogamani
- Patrick Pérez
- Patrick Mannion
- Ibrahim Sobh
- Victor Talpaert
- B. R. Kiran
In Automotive Engineering
- Ibrahim Sobh
- B. R. Kiran
- Patrick Pérez
- Peter Stone
- Senthil Kumar Yogamani
- Ahmad A. Al Sallab
- Patrick Mannion
- Victor Talpaert
Citations in the corpus
- Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Survey (2020, background): “As AD is essentially a multi-objective problem, methods from the field multi-objective RL such as thresholded lexicographic ordering may be easily applied and have been demonstrated to work well (see e.g. [80]).”
- Reward (Mis)design for Autonomous Driving (2021, background): “Application to AD Acknowledging the subjectivity of classifying whether reward is shaped when shaping is not explicitly discussed, we confidently judge that, of the 19 publications we surveyed, 13 included reward shaping via one or more attributes of their reward functions [13,29,24,32,53,9,21,48,37”