Guest Editorial, part of a Special Feature on Scale and Cross-scale Dynamics Scale and Cross-Scale Dynamics: Governance and Information in a Multilevel World

By David W. Cash, W. Adger, Fikret Berkes, P. Garden, L. Lebel, P. Olsson, Lowell Pritchard, O. Young. 2006

2,033 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/36b0bcfc7c6b9e873b60aa94b6230364afad6faf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Multilevel risk governance and urban adaptation policy (2011, background): “The availability of results such as these should increase the potential to make good decisions about adaptation today, particularly at local levels (Cash and Moser 2000; Cash et al. 2006).”
Governance and Complexity—Emerging Issues for Governance Theory (2008, background): “By allowing for interaction effects between different governance systems nested within each other, a somewhat different picture emerges (cf. Cash et al. 2006; Young 2006).”
Self-Organized Governance Networks for Ecosystem Management: Who Is Accountable? (2011, background): “Analyzing social change requires understanding of processes at several levels of social organization (Cash et al. 2006).”
Dancing the Supply Chain: Toward Transformative Supply Chain Management (2021, background): “In ecology, a level is understood as the unit of analysis located at a certain position on a scale of time and space (Berkes & Ross, 2016; Cash et al., 2006).1 For example, Allen et al. (2014) described a terrestrial ecosystem dominated by needle-leaved evergreens as having discrete processes and…”
Exploring future changes in smallholder farming systems by linking socio-economic scenarios with regional and household models (2014, methodology): “Complementary methods should be used that appropriately reflect the key dynamics of each of these levels (Cash et al., 2006).”
Understanding climate change impacts, vulnerability and adaptation at city scale: an introduction (2011, background): “The need for a foundation of knowledge about local vulnerability and impacts represents an opportunity for a fruitful two-way exchange between climate change scientists and impact experts on the one hand, and local and national decision-makers on the other (Cash and Moser 2000; Cash et al. 2006; NRC”
Environmental Governance for the Anthropocene? Social-Ecological Systems, Resilience, and Collaborative Learning (2017, background): “As such, governance issues in the Anthropocene are often multilevel, cutting across the jurisdictional scale and linking decision-makers horizontally and vertically [13,14].”
Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda (2012, background): “To include these multiple types of knowledge within and across multiple scales, approaches that do not assume scientific primacy or exclude alternative epistemologies are more likely to be successful (119, 120).”
Connecting Diverse Knowledge Systems for Enhanced Ecosystem Governance: The Multiple Evidence Base Approach (2014, background): “To enable successful synergies across knowledge systems, there is a need for true intercultural dialogues, which gives and promotes credibility and legitimacy for those involved (Yankelovich 1999; Cash et al. 2006; Rist et al. 2011).”
Adaptation, mitigation, and their disharmonious discontents: an essay (2012, background): “…nitrogen fertilizers to offset potential yield losses Increased emissions from agricultural sector Adapted from Bedsworth and Hanak (2008); Klein et al. (2007b); and additional refs in text governance may affect the action space of actors at lower jurisdictions, and so on (e.g., Cash et al. 2006).”
Understanding the relationships between ecosystem services and poverty alleviation: A conceptual framework (2014, unknown): “Scholars highlight the importance of cross-scale dynamics (Adger et al., 2006, Cash et al., 2006, Romero and Agrawal, 2011), and the framework supports analysis of these.”