Limitations of the Empirical Fisher Approximation

By Frederik Kunstner, Philipp Hennig, Lukas Balles. 2019

290 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Natural gradient descent, which preconditions a gradient descent update with the Fisher information matrix of the underlying statistical model, is a way to capture partial second-order information. Several highly visible works have advocated an approximation known as the empirical Fisher, drawing connections between approximate second-order methods and heuristics like Adam. We dispute this argument by showing that the empirical Fisher---unlike the Fisher---does not generally capture second-order information. We further argue that the conditions under which the empirical Fisher approaches the Fisher (and the Hessian) are unlikely to be met in practice, and that, even on simple optimization problems, the pathologies of the empirical Fisher can have undesirable effects.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Optimization & Training, Statistical Learning Theory

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Dan Alistarh
  2. Elias Frantar
  3. Yi-Lin Sung
  4. Agustinus Kristiadi
  5. Erik A. Daxberger
  6. Reinhard Heckel
  7. Philipp Hennig
  8. Christa Zoufal

In Optimization & Training

  1. Dan Alistarh
  2. Elias Frantar
  3. Reinhard Heckel
  4. Felix Dangel
  5. Frederik Kunstner
  6. Sidak Pal Singh
  7. Il-Su Park
  8. Piotr A. Sokól

In Statistical Learning Theory

  1. Reinhard Heckel
  2. Dan Alistarh
  3. Sidak Pal Singh
  4. Il-Su Park
  5. Piotr A. Sokól
  6. Navid Azizan
  7. Elias Frantar
  8. Marco Pavone

Citations in the corpus