The asteroid lightcurve database

581 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A study of asteroid pole-latitude distribution based on an extended set of shape models derived by the lightcurve inversion method (2011, methodology): “We used lightcurve amplitude data for ∼2500 asteroids from the Minor Planet Lightcurve Database (Warner et al. 2009) and found that the mean lightcurve amplitude is ∼0.3 mag.”
Absolute magnitudes of asteroids and a revision of asteroid albedo estimates from WISE thermal observations (2012, unknown): “R ) for a class predominating in their respective orbital group according to Table 2 of Warner et al. (2009).”
Asteroid Catalog Using AKARI: AKARI/IRC Mid-Infrared Asteroid Survey (2011, unknown): “%) in the light curves (Warner et al. 2009).”
INITIAL PERFORMANCE OF THE NEOWISE REACTIVATION MISSION (2014, unknown): “The IAU phase slope parameter G is assumed to be 0.15±0.10 unless independent measurements were available for a given object from Warner et al. (2009) or Pravec et al. (2012); otherwise, H values were taken from the Minor Planet Center.”
MAIN BELT ASTEROIDS WITH WISE/NEOWISE. I. PRELIMINARY ALBEDOS AND DIAMETERS (2011, methodology): “For all objects we assumed that the emissivity = 0.9 and we assumed that the magnitude-phase slope parameter (c.f. Bowell et al. 1989) was G = 0.15 unless otherwise given by the MPC or in the Lightcurve Database (LCDB4, Warner et al. 2009a).”