NIH plans to enhance reproducibility
By F. S. Collins, L. Tabak. 2014
1,125 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Francis S. Collins and Lawrence A. Tabak discuss initiatives that the US National Institutes of Health is exploring to restore the self-correcting nature of preclinical research.
Subfields: Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Small Animals, Statistics and Probability
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Surgical data science for next-generation interventions (2017, background): “Therefore the robustness and reliability of the methods are of crucial importance (33).”
- A public database of macromolecular diffraction experiments. (2016, background): “Introduction Issues with the reproducibility of published experimental results have recently attracted attention in many different scientific fields (Collins & Tabak, 2014).”
- ITK: enabling reproducible research and open science (2014, neutral): “…replacement for the verification of reproducibility, a mistake by which experimental work has been replaced by thought experiments and opinion-based evaluations that do little to further the scientific enterprise (Couzin, 2006; Baker, 2006; Prinz et al., 2011; Russel, 2013; Collins and Tabak, 2014).”
- An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research (2014, neutral): “…research practices and to adjust the training and incentives that maintain them ( Ioannidis and Khoury, 2011 ; Landis et al., 2012 ; Miguel et al., 2014 ; Nosek et al., 2012 ; Wagenmakers et al., 2012 ; Wadmann, 2013 ; Alberts et al., 2014 ; Asendorpf et al., 2013 ; Collins and Tabak, 2014 ).”