Composition of piscine prey in the diet of large pelagic fish in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean
By M. Moteki, M. Arai, K. Tsuchiya, H. Okamoto. 2001
87 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3687a491501a7cc0382c8e6d89029cb305e83eef
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Global and Planetary Change
Citations in the corpus
- Isotopic evidence of distinct feeding ecologies and movement patterns in two migratory predators (yellowfin tuna and swordfish) of the western Indian Ocean (2007, background): “The diet of yellowfin tunas is then mainly composed of organisms present in the upper 100 m ( Moteki et al. 2001; Bertrand et al. 2002; Potier et al. 2004, 2007), with no major ontogenetic changes (Me ´nard et al. 2006).”
- Relationships between otolith size and fish size in some mesopelagic and bathypelagic species from the Mediterranean Sea (Strait of Messina, Italy) (2010, background): “…behaviour have confirmed the mid-water species to be a primary trophic source for commercially important pelagic fishes such as tunas, mackerels and billfishes (Alverson, 1963; Abrams et al., 1996; Hassani et al., 1997; Lebourges-Dhaussy et al., 2000; Moteki et al., 2001; Consoli et al., 2008).”
- Diets of five important predatory mesopelagic fishes of the central North Pacific (2013, background): “Several studies report dietary preferences from the Pacific Ocean (Haedrich & Nielsen 1966, Kubota & Uyeno 1970, Okutani & Tsukada 1988, Moteki et al. 1993, 2001, Young et al. 2010), with brief notes from the Indian (e.g. Potier et al. 2007a,b, Romanov et al. 2008) and Atlantic Oceans (e.g. Satoh…”
- Overlap in distribution and diets of Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus), Norwegian spring-spawning herring (Clupea harengus) and blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) in the Norwegian Sea during late summer (2012, background): “Selectivity for particular sizes or species of prey may reflect the ease and energetic costs of capture (Werner & Hall 1974; Luo et al. 1996; Moteki et al. 2001) and should change with the concentration, distribution and abundance of the prey (Mayer & Wahl 1997; Munk 1997).”