Don't go with the flow: web services composition standards exposed

342 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Scientific workflow management and the Kepler system (2006, background): “5Despite the long history of business workflows, it is surprising how short-lived some of the so-called standards are, as “most of them die before becoming mature” [vdA03].”
QoS aggregation for Web service composition using workflow patterns (2004, background): “Furthermore, this pattern is also not supported by any flow languages analysed in [20].”
Business Process Modeling- A Comparative Analysis (2009, background): “Indeed, many available “standards” for process modeling lack rigorous evaluation (van der Aalst, 2003).”
Analysis of Web Services Composition Languages: The Case of BPEL4WS (2003, background): “Business collaborations require long-running interactions driven by explicit process models [1].”
Business process management (BPM) standards: a survey (2009, background): “In the fast-changing world of BPM standards, many standards do not even get to see the light of day (van der Aalst, 2003a, b; van der Aalst et al., 2005a, b).”
myExperiment: a repository and social network for the sharing of bioinformatics workflows (2010, background): “A wide variety of workflow languages have been created to describe data processing pipelines enabling them to be stored for repeated use (8).”