Chaos theory in geophysics: past, present and future

195 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Correlation dimension estimation of hydrological series and data size requirement: myth and reality/Estimation de la dimension de corrélation de séries hydrologiques et taille nécessaire du jeu de données: mythe et réalité (2005, background): “Addressing this is beyond the scope of the present study (see Gelhar, 1993 and Sivakumar, 2004 for details).”
Conditional resampling of hydrologic time series using multiple predictor variables: A K-nearest neighbour approach (2006, methodology): “We wish to acknowledge the constructive comments of Bellie Sivakumar, one of the AWR reviewers, whose inputs greatly benefited the quality of our presentation.”
Trees, networks, and hydrology (2006, background): “Deterministic fractals like Peano’s networks have been also exactly analyzed (for a perspective of dynamic bridges of determinism and stochasticity in the geophysical context, see, e.g., Sivakumar [2004] ).”
Hydrologic complexity and classification: a simple data reconstruction approach (2007, background): “While our efforts to obtain additional (and relevant) data to deal with hydrologic complexity continue, phase space and related concepts could be very useful, especially when integrated with our (limited) knowledge about the physics (see Sivakumar (2004b)).”