Analysing behavioural differences of farm households: An example of income diversification strategies based on European farm survey data
By Meike Weltin, Ingo Zasada, C. Franke, Annette Piorr, Meri Raggi, Davide Viaggi. 2017
140 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Different forms of income diversification represent important strategies of farmers to either cope with the changing economic framework conditions or to valorise given territorial potentialities. Nevertheless, the decision to diversify economic activities on or off the farm will heavily depend on the agricultural business and household characteristics. Our study used a survey of 2154 farms from eleven European regions to identify distinct farm types in order to investigate differences regarding the willingness to diversify in the future. Two scenario situations with continuation (baseline) and without any market intervention (“No CAP”) were tested. A factor and cluster analysis depicted six farm types both previously described and novel. The typology proved validity across all case studies, whereas single types occurred more frequently under specific site conditions. The six farm types showed strong variations in the stated future diversification behaviour. Young farm households with organic production are most likely to diversify activities particularly on-farm, whereas farm types characterised by intensive livestock holding and also already diversified and part-time farm households are least likely to apply this strategy. Results have further shown that under hypothetical conditions of termination of economic support by the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) an increasing share of farmers – throughout all types – would apply income diversification, mainly off-farm diversification, as a survival strategy.
Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/36567e5618ba5da6ed1849c8d2710b917cec9879
Citations in the corpus
- A review of types of risks in agriculture: What we know and what we need to know (2020, unknown): “Using off-farm income is especially important in response to institutional risks, such as the hypothetical ending of all Common Agricultural Policy payments (Weltin et al., 2017).”