Why Descriptive Science Still Matters
By D. Grimaldi, Michael S. Engel. 2007
96 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3652a862e634b86df88a313b1771d9979d57b0b6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Evan M. Kleiman
- P. Shanley
- C. López
- Brianna J. Turner
- Szymon Fedor
- E. Beale
- Jeffrey C. Huffman
- Matthew K. Nock
Citations in the corpus
- Examination of Real-Time Fluctuations in Suicidal Ideation and Its Risk Factors: Results From Two Ecological Momentary Assessment Studies (2017, background): “Indeed, many fields, such as biology (Grimaldi & Engel, 2007), immunology (Grimaldi & Engel, 2007), and neuroscience (Lichtman & Sanes, 2008) hold descriptive studies in high regard for their ability to verify existing hypotheses and generate new ones.”
- Out of the Loop: Why Research Rarely Reaches Policy Makers and the Public and What Can be Done (2009, background): “The field-worn researcher who publishes less due to time in the field engages in long-term or risk-taking research, or perseveres in focusing on whole organisms and ecosystems (Grimaldi & Engel 2007) may descend to the lower ranks or fade away.”