Algorithms for strong coupling procedures
By Hermann G. Matthies, R. Niekamp, J. Steindorf. 2006
252 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Numerical Analysis
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/363e1703053b9be72d01dc49ae32a80643b1b9cd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Mechanics
- Joris Degroote
- Jan A. Vierendeels
- Peter Bruggeman
- R. Haelterman
- S. Annerel
- Klaus-Jürgen Bathe
- Wolfgang Ehlers
- Y. Heider
In Numerical Analysis
- Joris Degroote
- Jan A. Vierendeels
- Peter Bruggeman
- Klaus-Jürgen Bathe
- R. Haelterman
- Gunwoo Noh
- Seounghyun Ham
- Marco Fossati
Citations in the corpus
- Performance of a new partitioned procedure versus a monolithic procedure in fluid-structure interaction (2009, methodology): “These methods have been applied in monolithic codes [11–15] but also in partitioned implementations with a matrix-free solver and finite-difference approximations in the calculation of the matrix–vector product [16,17].”
- Performance of partitioned procedures in fluid-structure interaction (2010, methodology): “The fixed-point problem can be solved with fixed-point iterations, also called (block) Gauss-Seidel iterations [22], which means that the flow problem and structural problem are solved successively until the change is smaller than the convergence criterion.”
- Comparison of monolithic and splitting solution schemes for dynamic porous media problems (2009, background): “The coupling can be classified from weak to strong depending on the degree of subsystem interaction [25, 48], where a coupling is commonly regarded as strong if the solution depends significantly on the accuracy of the coupling term calculation [23].”