Mycorrhizal networks mediate overstorey‐understorey competition in a temperate forest
By Michael G. Booth. 2004
133 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/363d898b0673dfb8f13ea801b39273df18246257
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Insect Science
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
In Plant Science
- Sarah McCarthy‐Neumann
- R. Kobe
- Matthias C. Rillig
- F. Borie
- P. Antunes
- D. Mummey
- S. Bedini
- P. Nannipieri
Citations in the corpus
- Arbuscular mycorrhizae and terrestrial ecosystem processes (2004, background): “Additionally, in the field AMF and plant communities likely form common mycelial networks (Simard et al. 2002; Booth 2004; van der Heijden 2004) ; these networks, providing linkages between roots of different plant species, representing pathways of nutrient exchange, and meditating competitive…”
- Mycorrhizal networks: Mechanisms, ecology and modelling (2012, unknown): “While MN access had negative effects on the survival of the AM species, Acer rubrum, it had neutral effects on the survival of three EM species, B. allegheniensis , T. canadensis and P. strobus, and positive effects on the growth of P. strobus (Booth, 2004).”
- Conspecific plant–soil feedbacks reduce survivorship and growth of tropical tree seedlings (2010, background): “Additionally, plant–soil feedbacks could be createdwhen a particular plant species is associated with the formation of mycorrhizal networks (Booth 2004), production of allelochemicals (Stinson et al. 2006), alterations to soil physical properties (Rillig, Wright & Eviner 2002) and nutrient…”