Prognostic factors for survival in adult patients with cerebral low-grade glioma.

By F. Pignatti, M. J. van den Bent, D. Curran, C. Debruyne, R. Sylvester, P. Therasse, D. Áfra, P. Cornu, Michel Bolla, C. Vecht and 1 more. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2002

874 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Epidemiology, Genetics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/36369ac53f34fb389d2d5f388f88d520203a335d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. M. Brada
2. J. Tonn
3. M. Bent
4. R. Stupp
5. G. Pentheroudakis
6. M. Davis

Citations in the corpus

• High-grade glioma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. (2014, background): “Based on these trials, a number of negative prognostic factors were identified: tumour size >5–6 cm, tumours crossing the mid-line, absence of oligodendroglial histology, age >40 years and neurological deficits before surgery [46].”
• Comparison of a strategy favoring early surgical resection vs a strategy favoring watchful waiting in low-grade gliomas. (2012, neutral): “Early, first 6 mo, postoperative radiotherapy 19 (29) 37 (43) .”