Global trade networks determine the distribution of invasive non‐native species

By Daniel S. Chapman, B. Purse, Helen E. Roy, J. Bullock. 2017

235 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/362c507e3140a26ace0642656e17e3b75c53ed36

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. R. Early
2. P. Hulme
3. Petr Pyšek
4. R. Epanchin‐Niell
5. D. Richardson
6. Y. Buckley
7. Michael J. Wingfield
8. Jan Pergl

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. R. Early
2. P. Hulme
3. Petr Pyšek
4. D. Richardson
5. T. Booth
6. F. Valladares

In Insect Science

1. P. Hulme
2. Petr Pyšek
3. D. Richardson
4. Jan Pergl
5. V. Jarošı́k

Citations in the corpus

• Unwelcome exchange: International trade as a direct and indirect driver of biological invasions worldwide (2021, background): “found in European countries and was again more important than climate similarity.(67) A further study examined the global trade network of wild-caught birds and found that the risk of establishment of alien birds in the European Union was closely”
• Forecasting the global extent of invasion of the cereal pest Spodoptera frugiperda, the fall armyworm (2018, background): “Trade is one of the main drivers of plant pest introduction globally (Chapman et al. 2017).”