Superconformal symmetry, NMSSM, and inflation

By Sergio Ferrara, R. Kallosh, Andrei Linde, Alessio Marrani, A. Proeyen. 2010

260 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We identify a particularly simple class of supergravity models describing superconformal coupling of matter to supergravity. In these models, which we call the canonical superconformal supergravity models, the kinetic terms in the Jordan frame are canonical, and the scalar potential is the same as in the global theory. The pure supergravity part of the total action has a local Poincare supersymmetry, whereas the chiral and vector multiplets coupled to supergravity have a larger local superconformal symmetry. The scale-free globally supersymmetric theories, such as the NMSSM with a scale-invariant superpotential, can be naturally embedded into this class of theories. After the supergravity embedding, the Jordan frame scalar potential of such theories remains scale free; it is quartic, it contains no mass terms, no nonrenormalizable terms, no cosmological constant. The local superconformal symmetry can be broken by additional terms, which, in the small field limit, are suppressed by the gravitational coupling. This can be achieved by introducing the nonminimal scalar-curvature coupling, and by taking into account interactions with a hidden sector. In this approach, the smallness of the mass parameters in the NMSSM may be traced back to the original superconformal invariance. This allows one to address the {mu} problem and themore » cosmological domain wall problem in this model, and to implement chaotic inflation in the NMSSM. We discuss the gravitino problem in the NMSSM inflation, as well as the possibility to obtain a broad class of new versions of chaotic inflation in supergravity.« less

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3629f469e17e51c546f14139c7728d64cbf79ae4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Andrei Linde
  2. R. Kallosh
  3. Sergio Ferrara
  4. J. Rubio
  5. Yohei Ema
  6. K. Nakayama
  7. D. Roest
  8. Ryusuke Jinno

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. Andrei Linde
  2. R. Kallosh
  3. Sergio Ferrara
  4. J. Rubio
  5. Yohei Ema
  6. K. Nakayama
  7. D. Roest
  8. Ryusuke Jinno

Citations in the corpus