Exploring the quality of evidence for complex and contested policy decisions

By J. P. van der Sluijs, Arthur C. Petersen, Peter H. M. Janssen, J. Risbey, Jerome Ravetz. 2008

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Policy decisions on complex environmental risks often involve contested science. Typically there are no ‘facts’ that entail a unique correct policy. The evidence that is embodied in scientific policy advice requires quality assessment. Advice should be relevant to the policy issue, scientifically tenable and robust under societal scrutiny. In 2003, the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency adopted a standardized method, referred to as ‘guidance’, whereby key quality aspects of knowledge production and use are exhibited through a checklist for uncertainty assessment and communication. Although the guidance is not fully used within all projects yet, it is increasingly used, attitudes towards dealing with uncertainty in performing and reporting environmental assessments have changed, and communication on uncertainty in the agency’s reports has improved over the past five years. In this letter, we present results from the application of the guidance to controversies on the risks of ambient particulate matter. The active deliberation on uncertainty in the policy–advisory setting brings about a joint learning process for advisors and policy makers, which leads to a deeper understanding and increased awareness of the phenomenon of uncertainty and its policy implications.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/36278a77607a69a67c833486b74c088805db2eb8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. Volker Krey
  2. Elmar Kriegler
  3. D. V. van Vuuren
  4. Christoph Kueffer
  5. R. Holderegger
  6. Bas J. van Ruijven
  7. Charlie Wilson

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

  1. Elmar Kriegler
  2. Charlie Wilson

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Elmar Kriegler
  2. Charlie Wilson

Citations in the corpus