Light-Cone Sum Rules with B-Meson Distribution Amplitudes

By A. Khodjamirian. 2007

221 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Algebra and Number Theory, Computer Networks and Communications, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/361b14aa1b4a158d368e68f6b7f1e9d8a43d5fc9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Algebra and Number Theory

In Computer Networks and Communications

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Review of lepton universality tests in B decays (2018, background): “large recoil of the final-state hadron in the b-hadron rest frame) [34–41], and Lattice QCD simulations for large q (small recoil) [42–49].”
Rare $B$ Decays as Tests of the Standard Model (2016, background): “Alternatively, LCSR can be formulated with B meson light-cone distribution amplitudes and an interpolating current for the vector meson [133]; currently, this results in larger uncertainties due to the limited experimental knowledge on the B meson light-cone distribution amplitudes.”
B →P and B →V form factors from B-meson light-cone sum rules beyond leading twist (2018, methodology): “2). To the precision we work at, only the mass m 1 of the quark eld q 1 enters the expressions. We fully reproduce the two-particle leading-twist contributions proportional to ˚ + and ˚ given in ref. [7]. Furthermore, we extend the two-particle results adding the terms containing g + and g , that ta”
Opportunities in Flavour Physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC (2018, unknown): “A calculation beyond this approximation is possible within the LCSRs [855, 856], and points to a correction of up to 10%.”
B →Vℓ+ℓ− in the Standard Model from light-cone sum rules (2015, methodology): “This program has been pursued in [22] at tree level in QCD and in SCET [23].”
On the anomalies in the latest LHCb data (2016, methodology): “icable for the entire kinematic range of q2. One should consider the following aspects: The form factor uncertainties are drastically reduced in the BSZ parametrisation compared to the ones in Refs. [19,90]. The main reason is very simple. In the latter reference the 6 authors used another LCSR appr”
B → K∗ℓ+ℓ− decays at large recoil in the Standard Model: a theoretical reappraisal (2015, methodology): “In the low q2 regime the form factors derived using LCSR [52, 53] have been recomputed with more precise hadronic inputs for q2 = 0.”
Global analysis of b → sℓℓ anomalies (2015, methodology): “[65] using the value of decay constants, masses and hadronic inputs (we use the same threshold parameter as for K∗ and the Borel parameter is set to M(2) = 1.”
Flavor Physics in the Quark Sector (2009, methodology): “Different versions of LCSR employing B-meson distribution amplitudes [452] as well as the framework of SCET [453,454] have also been introduced.”