Multitrophic Level Interactions: Plant genetic variation in tritrophic interactions
By J. Daniel Hare. 2002
91 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/35ffe8960f4a01aeb1e4a77829a6385913a75b54
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Marc T. J. Johnson
- T. Ohgushi
- P. Batáry
- T. C. Turlings
- Felix L. Wäckers
- Carsten F. Dormann
- A. Agrawal
- Dawn M. Olson
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- P. Batáry
- Marc T. J. Johnson
- Carsten F. Dormann
- Felix L. Wäckers
- T. Ohgushi
- T. C. Turlings
- A. Agrawal
- Dawn M. Olson
Citations in the corpus
- Effects of nitrogen fertilization on tritrophic interactions (2010, background): “…the foraging efficiency of, or host/prey suitability for the natural enemies (Benrey and Denno 1997), because plant traits that confer resistance to herbivores are not always compatible with the functioning of natural enemies of the herbivores (Cortesero et al. 2000; see Hare 2002 for a review).”
- Bottom-up trophic cascades and material transfer in terrestrial food webs (2005, background): “…has been repeatedly reviewed (Pace et al. 1999; Schmitz et al. 2000; Haraj and Wise 2001; Shurin et al. 2002; Borer et al. 2005), few systematic reviews have appeared for the bottom-up cascade, although it has been partially documented by Andow (1991), Hare (2002), and Lövei and Arpaia (2004).”
- Set-aside management: How do succession, sowing patterns and landscape context affect biodiversity? (2011, background): “Such plant diversity is a misleading predictor of the diversity of the second and third trophic levels (see Fritz, 1992; Hare, 2002).”
- PLANT GENOTYPE AND ENVIRONMENT INTERACT TO SHAPE A DIVERSE ARTHROPOD COMMUNITY ON EVENING PRIMROSE (OENOTHERA BIENNIS) (2005, background): “Plantsareknown to have specific defenses against herbivory, while traits that affect predators are considerably less common (Hare 2002).”
- Recruitment of predators and parasitoids by herbivore-injured plants (2004, background): “The need for more field data To demonstrate that a plant trait has a defensive function, it is necessary to show that it has a negative effect on plant antagonists, reduces the damage done to the plants, and increases plant fitness under natural conditions (Hare, 2002).”
- Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control (2019, background): “Studies on plant-herbivore-natural enemy interactions reveal that plant defense traits can have negative, positive, or neutral effects on natural enemies (Boethel and Eikenbary, 1986; Hare, 2002; Ode, 2006; Peterson et al., 2016b; Price et al., 1980).”
- Resistance Mechanisms Against Arthropod Herbivores in Cotton and Their Interactions with Natural Enemies (2013, background): “Trichomes can reduce the efficacy of parasitoids and predators and influence the structure of predator communities (Schuster and Calderon, 1986; Obrycki, 1986; Hare, 2002).”