Crisis in Competitive Versus Monopolistic Banking Systems
By Bruce D. Smith, Gianni De Nicolò, John H. Boyd. 2003
184 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/35ef398163ef68dbeb0560c261f6dd05d8e436d4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Antonio Trujillo-Ponce
- Phil Molyneux
- C. Cardone-Riportella
- Laura Baselga-Pascual
- Ulrich Heimeshoff
- Yongjia Lin
- X. Fu
- André Uhde
In Finance
- Antonio Trujillo-Ponce
- Phil Molyneux
- X. Fu
- C. Cardone-Riportella
- Laura Baselga-Pascual
- Ulrich Heimeshoff
- Yongjia Lin
- André Uhde
Citations in the corpus
- Bank competition and financial stability in Asia Pacific (2014, background): “Similarly, Boyd et al. (2004) state that the presence larger (monopolistic) banks in concentrated banking systems might enhance profits and thus reduce financial fragility by providing higher “capital buffers” that protect these systems against external macroeconomic and liquidity shocks.”
- Consolidation in banking and financial stability in Europe: Empirical evidence (2008, background): “…of the “concentration-stability view” suggest that larger (monopolistic) banks in concentrated banking systems may enhance profits and thus reduce financial fragility by providing higher “capital buffers” that protect them against external macroeconomic and liquidity shocks (Boyd et al., 2004).”
- Factors influencing bank risk in Europe: Evidence from the financial crisis (2015, background): “According to the so-called concentration stability view, monopolistic banks in concentrated banking systems may enhance profits and thus reduce financial fragility by providing higher ‘‘capital buffers” that protect them against external macroeconomic and liquidity shocks (Boyd et al., 2004).”