Do Public Subsidies Complement Business R&D? A Meta‐Analysis of the Econometric Evidence

By J. García‐Quevedo. 2004

289 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/35e7467c5a1aab2e6dffb315cfe99d4b528d9cc4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Finance

Citations in the corpus

R&D subsidies and private R&D expenditures: evidence from Italian manufacturing data (2011, methodology): “Meta-analysis by Garcia-Quevedo (2004) for instance, found that conclusions may depend on the level of analysis, and there is weak evidence that micro-level studies show the existence of crowding out effects.”
Research and Development, Cash Flow, Agency and Governance: UK large companies (2012, unknown): “The study by David et al (2001) and the meta-study by Garcia-Quevedo (2004) were inconclusive.”
Factors explaining local privatization: a meta-regression analysis (2009, unknown): “(4) (5) 10 It is worth noting here that publication bias is an important limitation of meta-regression analysis (Stanley, 2001; García-Quevedo, 2004; Roberts, 2005) as papers usually tend be published when significant relationships between the variables of interest are effectively found.”
The link between public support and private r&d effort: what is the optimal subsidy? (2011, unknown): “…years, public policy evaluation has acquired growing importance and although the results are not entirely conclusive, recent literature reviews (David et al., 2000; García-Quevedo, 2004) indicate that, in the case of R&D subsidies, the existence of an additional effect is the most frequent outcome.”
Demand-side vs. supply-side technology policies: Hidden treatment and new empirical evidence on the policy mix (2015, background): “Garcia-Quevedo (2004) discusses the studies reviewed in these surveys and counts 37 articles presenting some evidence of complementarity, and 24 showing a net effect of substitutability, while the remaining 15 do not produce statistically significant results.”
ASSESSING THE EFFECT OF PUBLIC SUBSIDIES ON FIRM R&D INVESTMENT: A SURVEY (2014, methodology): “The disparity in results can be attributed to differences in the populations under study (time periods, countries of interest, business sectors), the variables used and the empirical approach (see, among others, Capron and Van Pottelsberghe, 1997; David et al., 2000; Garcı́a-Quevedo, 2004; Aerts and”
Do subsidies to private capital boost firms' growth? A multiple regression discontinuity design approach (2014, background): “The evaluation literature has devoted particular attention towards the incentives to R&D as well documented in the surveys by García-Quevedo (2004) and Parsons and Phillips (2007).”
Public R&D Policies and Private R&D Investment: A Survey of the Empirical Evidence (2015, background): “Surveys of the likewise rapidly advancing literature on the first category, R&D tax credits (Hall and Van Reenen, 2000) and direct subsidies (David, Hall and Toole, 2000; García-Quevedo, 2004), exist essentially only for the early, mainly pre-2000 work.”