Comparative credit risk in Islamic and conventional bank

By M. Kabir, Andrew C. Worthington, Rakesh Gupta. 2015

228 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Finance, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/35de2f80331123d98927c61bb179685519e0c105

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Fotios Pasiouras
2. Abul Shamsuddin
3. Muhammad Safiullah
4. Iftekhar Hasan
5. Fadzlan Sufian
6. Sailesh Tanna
7. Peterson K. Ozili
8. Ana Lozano-Vivas

In Finance

1. Fotios Pasiouras
2. Abul Shamsuddin
3. Muhammad Safiullah
4. Iftekhar Hasan
5. Michael Doumpos
6. Fadzlan Sufian
7. Sailesh Tanna
8. Peterson K. Ozili

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Abul Shamsuddin
2. Muhammad Safiullah
3. Iftekhar Hasan

Citations in the corpus

• Risk in Islamic banking and corporate governance (2018, background): “This model differs from those of prior studies on Islamic banks' risk (Čihák and Hesse, 2010; Beck et al., 2013; Abedifar et al., 2013; Kabir et al., 2015) in that it considers additional measures of bank risk, and adds board governance and ownership concentration as risk determinants to our…”
• Bank overall financial strength: Islamic versus conventional banks (2017, background): “Other studies compare the financial ratios of the banks, focusing on individual aspects like capital adequacy (Beck et al., 2013), deposits and loans growth (Karim et al., 2014), credit risk (Kabir et al., 2015), bank insolvency risk (Bourkhis and Nabi, 2013), and profitability (Beck et al., 2013).”