Staying in touch with nature and well-being in different income groups: The experience of urban parks in Bogotá
By Massimiliano Scopelliti, G. Carrus, C. Adinolfi, G. Suárez, Giuseppe Colangelo, Raffaele Lafortezza, Angelo Panno, Giovanni Sanesi. 2016
173 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract Studies on the positive effects of contact with nature have been mainly conducted in European countries, North America, and Australia, whereas the experience of nature for people living in other countries is still to be adequately investigated. Investigation of the beneficial effects of nature is particularly important in dense urban areas characterized by heavy environmental stress-related problems, like crowding and noise, and for people suffering from income-related well-being inequalities. To contribute to filling this gap, the present study investigated the effects of contact with urban parks on well-being among residents in Bogota, Colombia. A questionnaire was administered to an opportunistic sample of 398 respondents (300 of which were completed and used in the analyses) in parks located in three districts differing in socio-economic status. The residents of these districts were representative of the upper, middle, and lower income groups. The questions asked about the use of green areas and related psychological variables, such as human-nature interdependence, connectedness to nature, perceived restorative and affective qualities attributed to the park, emotions experienced, and overall well-being derived from the park experience. The results showed higher levels of well-being for people in the middle-income group and a relevant role of nature-related activities and psychological variables in explaining such beneficial outcomes. Differences in the mechanisms leading to well-being also emerged for the three income groups. Theoretical and practical implications of the study are discussed.
Subfields: Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Plant Science, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/35d695f5f4cd8bd4b7c08efb10f4666e2a9c44fb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
In Plant Science
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Does happiness data say urban parks are worth it? (2018, background): “, 2016), and preferences for the amenities provided by urban parks may be different among different income groups (Ambrey & Fleming, 2011; Scopelliti et al., 2016).”
- Exploring the link between neighborhood environment and mental wellbeing: A case study in Beijing, China (2017, background): “…shown that greenspace and landscape is a health resource that promotes physical, mental, and social wellbeing (Abraham, Sommerhalder, & Abel, 2010; Bratman, Hamilton, & Daily, 2012; Carrus et al., 2015; Francis, Wood, Knuiman, & Giles-Corti, 2012; Lachowycz & Jones, 2013; Scopelliti et al., 2016).”
- Predictors of Nature Connection Among Urban Residents: Assessing the Role of Childhood and Adult Nature Experiences (2018, methodology): “73 years), found that nature connection, as measured by the Connectedness to Nature Scale, was higher among visitors to larger urban parks as opposed to smaller district parks (Scopelliti et al., 2016).”