Coyote foraging ecology and vigilance in response to gray wolf reintroduction in Yellowstone National Park

By T. Switalski. 2003

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Does a top‐predator provide an endangered rodent with refuge from an invasive mesopredator? (2009, background): “Interference competition, whereby smaller predators avoid interactions with larger predators, and thus change their use of habitat and foraging patterns, may also occur (Switalski, 2003; Berger & Gese, 2007).”
Landscapes of Coexistence for terrestrial carnivores: the ecological consequences of being downgraded from ultimate to penultimate predator by humans (2015, background): “…refugia in response to risk of intraspecific and intraguild predation and competition during vulnerable activities e.g. when concealing young (Fernandez and Palomares 2000), resting (Switalski 2003), or feeding on a carcass that might attract the attention of larger carnivores (Hunter et al. 2007).”
Coyote prey selection and community stability during a decline in food supply (2005, background): “Wolves and humans (providers of the carrion) are known to kill coyotes (Polis et al. 1982, Paquet 1992, Switalski 2003, Wilmers et al. 2003), whereas the risks associated with hunting hares are minimal.”