Parent and Child Perspectives of Family Leisure Involvement and Satisfaction with Family Life

By R. Zabriskie, B. McCormick. 2003

331 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/35be1a6a759358903493b6a7abe611fddeaed730

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The Contribution of Couple Leisure Involvement, Leisure Time, and Leisure Satisfaction to Marital Satisfaction (2006, methodology): “The model has also been utilized to examine the contributions of core and balance leisure involvement to the related construct of family satisfaction (Zabriskie & McCormick, 2003).”
The contribution of vacations to quality of life (2012, methodology): “Within this model, core family leisure patterns are depicted by “common, everyday, low-cost, relatively accessible, and often home-based activities that many families do frequently” (Zabriskie & McCormick, 2003, p. 168).”
Family and Relationship Benefits of Travel Experiences (2013, background): “Numerous studies have revealed positive effects on family cohesion due to recreation and leisure activities (Hornberger, Zabriskie, Freeman 2010; Poff 2010; Zabriskie 2003; Zabriskie and McCormick 2001; Holman and Jacquart 1988; Smith, Snyder, and Monsama 1988).”
Family Leisure Satisfaction and Satisfaction with Family Life (2009, methodology): “Scores were consistent with previous research that used the SWLS to measure family satisfaction (Zabriskie & McCormick, 2003).”
Contributions of Family Leisure to Family Functioning Among Single-Parent Families (2010, methodology): “To approach a family perspective, three data sets were compiled: responses of parents, responses of youth, and a family perspective by calculating mean scores for each parent and their child as recommended in previous work (Zabriskie & Freeman, 2004; Zabriskie & McCormick, 2003).”
Putting the “We” Into Well‐being: Using Collectivism‐Themed Measures of Well‐Being Attenuates Well‐being's Association With Individualism (2019, methodology): “First, the family well-being constructs under investigation (i.e., family life satisfaction and family interdependent happiness) are adapted from individual well-being constructs (Hu, Summers, Turnbull, & Zuna, 2011; Park et al., 2003; Zabriskie & McCormick, 2003).”
Satisfaction With Family Life Scale (2013, background): “…(7.22) .93 898 24.95 (7.14) .93 5–35 National sample general families (Hornberger, 2007) 380 25.38 (6.86) .91 343 24.96 (7.05) .94 5–35 General families (Zabriskie & McCormick, 2003) 179 24.85 (6.60) .89 178 24.84 (6.65) .88 7–35 Canadian sample general families (Zabriskie, 2008) 1175 23.42…”
Children's Exposure to Negative Internet Content: Effects of Family Context (2005, background): “Parent–child interactions or shared family activities are among the most salient forces in establishing and maintaining family relationships and boundaries (Zabriskie & McCormick, 2003).”
An Examination of Family Communication within the Core and Balance Model of Family Leisure Functioning (2009, background): “Core family leisure activities, therefore, are theoretically related to the cohesion dimension of the Circumplex Model and balance family leisure activities are theoretically related to the flexibility dimension (see Figure 2) (Zabriskie & McCormick, 2003).”