Bioanalytical Method Validation—A Revisit with a Decade of Progress

By V. Shah, K. Midha, J. Findlay, H. Hill, J. Hulse, I. McGilveray, G. Mckay, K. J. Miller, R. Patnaik, M. Powell and 3 more. Pharmaceutical Research, 2000

1,644 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cell Biology, Immunology, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3586661d5b57c3ae765f98c7f9112a16ab45d48a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Immunology

1. P. Taylor

In Molecular Biology

1. F. Peters
2. P. Taylor
3. F. Musshoff
4. O. Drummer

Citations in the corpus

• Matrix effects: the Achilles heel of quantitative high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry. (2005, methodology): “This variability would be considered acceptable for method validation based on current opinion [39].”
• Validation of new methods. (2007, methodology): “One approach to establish method selectivity is to prove the lack of response in blank matrix [1,5,7–9,11,14], i.”