The future for electrocoagulation as a localised water treatment technology.
By P. Holt, G. Barton, C. Mitchell. Chemosphere, 2005
698 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Water Science and Technology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3565e8c813f5f84ac8041d8943bd279f488d30be
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
In Water Science and Technology
- M. El‐Naas
- Mohammed Al-Marri
- M. Nasser
- Muttucumaru Sivakumar
- A. Akyol
- D. Moussa
- M. Emamjomeh
- S. Idrus
Citations in the corpus
- Review of pollutants removed by electrocoagulation and electrocoagulation/flotation processes. (2009, background): “Another search by the same authors (Holt et al., 2005) showed that three operating stages (lag, reactive and stable) were identified in a batch electrocoagulation reactor.”
- A comprehensive review of electrocoagulation for water treatment: Potentials and challenges. (2017, background): “Even the smallest colloidal particles are removed by EC since the applied electric current makes collision faster and facilitates coagulation (Mollah et al., 2004, Mollah et al., 2001; Holt et al., 2005; Bazrafshan et al., 2015).”
- Microalgae Cultivation Using Offshore Membrane Enclosures for Growing Algae (OMEGA) (2013, neutral): “[41,42].”
- Treatment of paint manufacturing wastewater by electrocoagulation (2012, methodology): “This technique has some advantages when compared to conventional methods such as simple equipment, easy to operate, less retention time, reduction or absence of adding chemicals, rapid sedimentation of the electrogenerated flocs and less sludge production [16,17].”