Cognitive Bibliotherapy for Depression: A Meta-Analysis.

By R. Gregory, S. S. Canning, Tracy W. Lee, J. Wise. 2004

199 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3553b010f6e72815ad80831a65003766a91d8982

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Gerhard Andersson
2. Pim Cuijpers
3. Per Carlbring
4. Heleen Riper

In Clinical Psychology

1. Pim Cuijpers
2. Gerhard Andersson

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Gerhard Andersson
2. Pim Cuijpers
3. Per Carlbring

Citations in the corpus

• Is guided self-help as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies (2010, background): “…then, dozens of randomized trials and meta-analyses have shown that guided self-help is effective in reducing depression, panic disorder, phobias and other anxiety disorders (Cuijpers, 1997 ; Gregory et al. 2004 ; Hirai & Clum, 2006; Gellatly et al. 2007 ; Menchola et al. 2007 ; Spek et al. 2007).”
• Bibliotherapy (2008, unknown): “However, with that said, over the years the methodological quality of individual studies has most definitely improved and the methods of review have been refined and become increasingly statistically based (Gregory et al., 2004).”