Visual field map clusters in human cortex
By Brian A. Wandell, Alyssa A. Brewer, Robert F. Dougherty. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2005
311 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3543adf9b2d59ac95d6e765dc1d0b3aba04e7413
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Brian A. Wandell
- Serge O. Dumoulin
- Jonathan Winawer
- Nikos K. Logothetis
- Mark A. Halko
- Lotfi B. Merabet
- Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
- A. Roskies
Citations in the corpus
- Imaging retinotopic maps in the human brain (2010, background): “Finally, it has been observed that the visual maps tend to fall in clusters that share a common eccentricity map and perhaps a computational objective (Kolster et al., 2009; Wandell et al., 2005).”
- What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI (2008, methodology): “Gustafsson, Afterpotentials and transduction properties in different types of central neurones, 122(1), 17 (1984).”
- Population receptive field estimates in human visual cortex (2008, background): “Other groups find small but reliable modulations and maps in these regions (Brewer et al., 2005; Larsson and Heeger, 2006; Wandell et al., 2005).”
- Visual Topography of Human Intraparietal Sulcus (2007, background): “Furthermore, the foveal representation of V7 is confluent with that of IPS1, suggesting the two maps form a unitary complex or cluster (Balasubramanian et al., 2002; Wandell et al., 2005).”
- Visual field maps in human cortex. (2007, unknown): “Therefore, multiple reports of the same pattern from different labs should not be outweighed by the occasional inability to identify these maps (see Discussion in Wandell et al., 2005).”