Governance, economic settings and poverty in Bangalore
By Solomon Benjamin. 2000
310 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Urban Studies
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/353a7b096c578c7a2b82cd7f4aff3a7d700425a5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Urban Studies
Citations in the corpus
- Filtering Risk Away: Global Finance Capital, Transcalar Territorial Networks and the (Un)Making of City-Regions: An Analysis of Business Property Development in Bangalore, India (2014, background): “BENJAMIN (2000, 2004) has demonstrated how a series of small-scale industrial clusters were pushed out of the central part of the agglomeration togetherwith the disruptive negative effects on the informal ties associated with their geographic proximity.”
- Adverse Incorporation, Social Exclusion and Chronic Poverty (2007, background): “Scott has long emphasised the ways in which the ‘weapons of the weak’ often involve the manipulation of client - patron relationships ‘from below’ (Scott, 1985); and there is some evidence that the poor are sometimes able to mobilise clientelistic relations as a form of direct democracy (Benjamin, 2”
- Mumbai's Development Mafias: Globalization, Organized Crime and Land Development (2008, unknown): “…by researchers identifying similar patron–client networks in other locations, the ambiguity resulting from a neglectful state, corrupt enforcement, and otherwise powerless urban residents makes it less useful to consider these illegal acts in moral terms (Singerman, 1995; Benjamin, 2000).”