Impacts of Inbreeding in Natural and Captive Populations of Vertebrates: Implications for Conservation
By R. Lacy. 2015
92 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/35279fd8f430719555461a3b726267dbb2a633c3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Gordon Luikart
- Kevin S. McKelvey
- L. S. Mills
- N. Yoccoz
- Steven R. Beissinger
- E. Menges
- J. Reed
- K. Norris
In Genetics
- Kevin S. McKelvey
- Gordon Luikart
- L. S. Mills
- N. Yoccoz
- Steven R. Beissinger
- E. Menges
- Marie‐Charlotte Anstett
- M. D. Schwartz
Citations in the corpus
- Genetic diversity-fitness correlation revealed by microsatellite analyses in European alpine marmots (Marmota marmota) (2006, background): “…between individual genetic variability and fitness, or more often fitness-related traits, has long been of interest to evolutionary and conservation biologists (Allendorf and Leary 1986; Houle 1989; Lacy 1993; Mitton 1993; David 1998; Hansson and Westerberg 2002; Coltman and Slate 2003).”
- Emerging Issues in Population Viability Analysis (2002, background): “For a range of animal species, the cost of inbreeding has been quantified for juvenile survival (Ralls et al. 1988; Laikre & Ryman 1991; Lacy 1993), adult survival ( Jiménez et al. 1994), and reproduction (e.g., Ballou 1997; Lacy & Horner 1997).”